hit counter

Esketamine Failed Cost-Effectiveness vs. Cheaper TRD Options at $50K/QALY

Photoreal illustration of a depression-treatment decision with cost and outcome imagery, conveying healthcare-economic decision-making.

Intranasal esketamine — FDA-approved for treatment-resistant depression in 2019 — failed cost-effectiveness benchmarks against four cheaper third-line options in a 2026 Hong Kong modeling study, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of US$134,127 to US$312,750 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at a US$50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold.1 Combination antidepressant therapy was the most cost-effective strategy modeled. Research Highlights …

Read more